Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
New endoscopic classification of achalasia for selection of candidates for peroral endoscopic myotomy
1Department of Gastroenterology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Aim:
To propose a new endoscopic classification of achalasia for selecting patients appropriate for undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
Methods:
We screened out the data of patients with achalasia examined from October 2000 to September 2011 at our Digestive Endoscopic Center with endoscopic pictures clear enough to reveal the morphology of middle and lower esophagus. After analyzing the correlation between the endoscopic morphology of the esophageal lumen and POEM, we proposed a new endoscopic classification (Ling classification) of achalasia according to three kinds of endoscopically viewed structures: multi-ring structure, crescent-like structure and diverticulum structure. There were three types based on the criteria of Ling classification: type I, smooth without multi-ring, crescent-like structure or diverticulum structure; type II, with multi-ring or crescent-like structure but without diverticulum structure; and type III, with diverticulum structure. Type II was classified into three subtypes: Ling II(a), Ling II(b) and Ling II(c); and type III also had three subtypes: Ling III(l), Ling III(r) and Ling III(lr). Two endoscopists made a final decision upon mutual agreement through discussion if their separately recorded characteristics were different.
Results:
Among the 976 screened patients with achalasia, 636 patients with qualified endoscopic pictures were selected for the analysis, including 405 males and 231 females. The average age was 42.7 years, ranging from 6 to 93 years. Type I was the most commonly observed type of achalasia, accounting for 64.5% (410/636), and type III was the least commonly observed type of achalasia, accounting for 2.8% (18/636). And type II accounted for 32.7% (208/636) and subtype of Ling II(a), Ling II(b) and Ling II(c) accounted for 14.6% (93/636), 9.9% (63/636) and 8.2% (52/636), respectively. And subtype of Ling III(l), Ling III(r) and Ling III(lr) accounted for 0.8% (5/636), 0.3% (2/636) and 1.7% (11/636), respectively.
Conclusion:
A new endoscopic classification of achalasia is proposed that might help in determining the proper candidates for POEM.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Achalasia
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

