Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Axon Stretch Growth: The Mechanotransduction of Neuronal Growth
Published on: August 10, 2011
Don't rock the boat: how antiphase crew coordination affects rowing.
Anouk J de Brouwer1, Harjo J de Poel, Mathijs J Hofmijster
1MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.j.de.brouwer@vu.nl
Antiphase crew rowing, where rowers alternate movements, may improve performance by reducing power loss. This contrasts with synchronous rowing, showing optimal stability doesn't always mean optimal efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Human Movement
Background:
- Crew rowing traditionally emphasizes synchronous movements for optimal performance.
- A counterintuitive concept suggests out-of-phase (antiphase) rowing could offer benefits over in-phase (synchronous) rowing.
- Synchronous rowing incurs power loss (5-6%) due to velocity fluctuations within each cycle.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance and efficiency of antiphase versus in-phase crew rowing.
- To investigate if antiphase coordination can reduce power loss and enhance average boat velocity.
- To examine the stability and variability of antiphase coordination in experienced rowers.
Main Methods:
- Nine pairs of rowers performed two-minute maximum effort trials in both in-phase and antiphase coordination.
- Trials were conducted on coupled free-floating ergometers simulating power loss to velocity fluctuations.
- Rower and ergometer kinetics and kinematics were measured throughout the experiment.
Main Results:
- Antiphase coordination was acquired by all pairs during warm-up, though one pair reverted to in-phase during maximal effort.
- While antiphase coordination showed increased variability, it did not negatively impact power production.
- Antiphase rowing significantly decreased power loss to velocity fluctuations, transferring more useful power to ergometer flywheels.
Conclusions:
- Antiphase crew rowing may enhance performance by improving power transfer efficiency, even without prior specific training.
- The findings challenge the notion that the most stable coordination (in-phase) is necessarily the most efficient or optimal for performance.
- This research suggests exploring alternative coordination strategies in team sports for potential performance gains.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Applications of Stress
The...
Three-Dimensional Force System
Social Loafing
Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.
Oscillations about an Equilibrium Position

