Protein complex formation: computational clarification of the sequential versus probabilistic recruitment puzzle
Manuel Schölling1, Stefan Thurner, Rudolf Hanel
1Section for Science of Complex Systems/CeMSIIS, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Plos One
|February 6, 2013
Summary
Conflicting experimental data on gene transcription regulation arise from different protein recruitment models. A generalized recruitment model reveals that transient binding events are missed by ChIP assays, necessitating a new method to distinguish recruitment types.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Systems Biology
Background:
- Protein complex assembly and disassembly at gene promoter sites are crucial for transcription regulation.
- Existing experimental methods like ChIP-on-chip assays and GFP-based assays yield conflicting characteristics of protein recruitment dynamics.
- ChIP assays suggest ordered, consecutive recruitment, while GFP assays indicate chaotic or stochastic recruitment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reconcile conflicting experimental observations regarding protein recruitment at gene promoters.
- To develop a generalized recruitment model (GRM) simulating recruitment dynamics from sequential to probabilistic.
- To identify limitations of current ChIP assays in detecting transient protein binding events.
Main Methods:
- Development of a generalized recruitment model (GRM) to simulate various protein recruitment scenarios.
- Simulation of protein binding dynamics under different recruitment models (sequential vs. probabilistic).
- Comparison of simulation outputs with characteristics of data obtained from ChIP and GFP-based assays.
Main Results:
- Probabilistic, transient protein binding events, detectable by GFP assays, are often missed by standard ChIP experiments.
- Both sequential recruitment and probabilistic recruitment with 'shortcuts' can exhibit periodic dynamics, making them difficult to distinguish using standard ChIP measurements.
- The GRM successfully simulates scenarios bridging ordered and stochastic protein recruitment.
Conclusions:
- Standard ChIP measurements have inherent limitations in distinguishing between different protein recruitment mechanisms.
- A novel, simple experimental method is proposed to differentiate between sequential and probabilistic recruitment processes.
- Understanding these recruitment dynamics is essential for a comprehensive view of gene transcription regulation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Protein Complex Assembly
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types. Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Protein Complex Assembly
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types. Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...


