Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Common misconceptions.

D J Tennenhouse1

  • 1University of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco.

Ophthalmology
|July 1, 1979
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians often misunderstand the legal system. This analysis clarifies that law resolves disputes, not justice, and outcomes depend on evidence and other factors, not just case merit.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some legal decisions significant for ophthalmology.

Survey of ophthalmology·1987
Same author

Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts.

Radiology·1986
Same author

Radiologists and informed-consent lawsuits.

Radiology·1985
Same author

The physician's duty to warn: a new twist.

Survey of ophthalmology·1984
Same author

Nosocomial medicolegal problems.

Survey of ophthalmology·1983
Same author

A short introduction to the law of medical practice.

International ophthalmology clinics·1980

Area of Science:

  • Legal Studies
  • Medical Law

Background:

  • Physicians frequently hold misconceptions regarding legal principles.
  • Understanding the legal system is crucial for medical professionals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address and correct common physician misconceptions about the law.
  • To clarify the fundamental purpose and nature of the legal system for medical practitioners.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of legal principles relevant to physicians.
  • Review of common misunderstandings in legal discourse within the medical field.

Main Results:

  • The legal system's primary function is dispute resolution, not the dispensation of abstract justice.
  • Legal rules are inherently dynamic and lack absolute clarity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Litigation outcomes are determined by presented evidence, acknowledging that factors beyond case merit significantly influence results.

    • Conclusions:

    • Physicians should recognize the practical, evidence-based nature of law.
    • A clearer understanding of legal realities can aid physicians in navigating legal challenges.