Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The physician's duty to warn: a new twist.

D J Tennenhouse

    Survey of Ophthalmology
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Physicians must warn patients about risks. A recent court ruling indicates doctors may be liable if a patient injures someone due to an undisclosed medical condition.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Some legal decisions significant for ophthalmology.

    Survey of ophthalmology·1987
    Same author

    Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts.

    Radiology·1986
    Same author

    Radiologists and informed-consent lawsuits.

    Radiology·1985
    Same author

    Nosocomial medicolegal problems.

    Survey of ophthalmology·1983
    Same author

    A short introduction to the law of medical practice.

    International ophthalmology clinics·1980
    Same author

    Medical recordkeeping.

    International ophthalmology clinics·1980

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Ophthalmology
    • Patient Safety

    Background:

    • Physicians have a duty to warn patients of medical conditions posing a risk of injury.
    • Legal precedents traditionally focus on patient safety within the physician-patient relationship.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the implications of the Myers v. Quesenberry case for ophthalmologists.
    • To discuss the evolving legal landscape regarding physician liability for patient actions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of the legal decision in Myers v. Quesenberry.
    • Analysis of the case's impact on medical malpractice and duty of care.

    Main Results:

    • The Myers v. Quesenberry case expands physician liability beyond direct patient harm.
    • Physicians may face legal consequences for failing to adequately warn patients of conditions that could endanger third parties.

    Conclusions:

    • Ophthalmologists must be aware of potential liability for failing to warn patients about debilitating conditions.
    • This ruling underscores the importance of thorough patient communication and risk disclosure in medical practice.

    Related Experiment Videos