Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Marie Fidela R Paraiso1, Beri Ridgeway, Amy J Park

  • 1Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. paraism@ccf.org

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|February 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Perioperative Risk According to Surgical Route in Hysterectomy for Very Large Uteri.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2026
Same author

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

Uterine Preservation in Prolapse Surgery-Evolving Perspectives.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

Stool Microbiota, Metabolites, and Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Injuries Associated with Peritoneal Entry Device in Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of Reports to the FDA.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same author

Generalized Sensory Sensitivity in Patients With Urinary Urgency-A LURN II Urinary Urgency Phenotyping Study.

The Journal of urology·2026

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is safe but takes longer than traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Both methods show similar complication rates and recovery times for patients undergoing the procedure for benign conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
  • Surgical Technology Advancement
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background:

  • Hysterectomy is a common gynecologic procedure.
  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) are established minimally invasive techniques.
  • Direct comparison of operative times and complications is essential for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare operative time and intra- and postoperative complications between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (R-TLH).

Main Methods:

  • Blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial at two institutions.
  • 53 women with benign indications for hysterectomy were randomized to TLH (27) or R-TLH (26).
  • Outcomes included operative time, blood loss, complications, pain, and return to daily activities.

More Related Videos

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

Main Results:

  • Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrated significantly longer total case time (+77 minutes) and operating room time (+72 minutes) compared to TLH.
  • No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, hematocrit change, length of stay, or complication rates between the two groups.
  • Postoperative pain and return to daily activities were comparable between TLH and R-TLH.

Conclusions:

  • Both TLH and R-TLH are safe surgical options for hysterectomy.
  • Robotic assistance significantly increases operative time without conferring additional benefits in terms of complications or recovery.
  • Surgeons should consider the extended operative time associated with R-TLH when selecting a minimally invasive approach.