Related Experiment Videos
Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in an all-comers patient population
Mohammed Ali1, Alan Hanley, Brendan McAdam
1Department of Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital, Ireland.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis is safe and effective for improving survival in high-risk patients. This study demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes in a real-world setting.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease treatment aims to enhance survival and alleviate symptoms.
- Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) safety and efficacy have been compared in numerous studies.
- Unprotected LMCA stenosis poses significant risks, necessitating effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of stenting unprotected LMCA stenosis in routine clinical practice.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected LMCA stenosis in unselected patients.
- To analyze major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing unprotected LMCA stenting.
Main Methods:
- A prospective registry of 158 patients with symptomatic unprotected LMCA stenosis undergoing PCI.
- Surgical mortality risk estimated using the euroSCORE.
- Primary endpoint: MACE (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) at follow-up.
Main Results:
- Mean follow-up was 54 ± 25 months.
- The overall MACE rate was 11.4%.
- Cardiac death occurred in 12 patients (7.6%), with higher rates in patients with elevated euroSCORE (21.6 ± 5.5, P < 0.001).
- In-stent restenosis occurred in 4.4% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Stenting of unprotected LMCA stenosis is safe and clinically effective in high-risk patients.
- The procedure helps maintain event-free survival in the long term.
- This ongoing registry supports PCI as a viable treatment option for unprotected LMCA stenosis.
Background:
The goal of treating patients with coronary artery disease is to improve survival and relieve symptoms. Several studies have compared the safety and efficacy of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting and coronary-artery bypass grafting in case control and randomized trials.
Objective:
In this study we present the long term outcome of stenting unprotected LMCA stenosis in day to day practice in unselected patients.
Methods:
One hundred and fifty eight patients were prospectively recruited with symptomatic unprotected LMCA stenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using the euroSCORE, each patient's surgical mortality risk was estimated. Study end-points were any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at follow-up with either CABG or repeat PCI.
Results:
The mean follow-up was 54 ± 25 months. The mean euroSCORE was 10.6 ± 13.4 (0.9-71) and the mean SYNTAX score was 39.6 ± 10.7 (10-65). The MACE rate was 11.4% at a mean follow up of 54 months. Six (3.8%) patients suffered postprocedure myocardial infarction. There were 24 (15%) deaths of which 12 were cardiac (mean euroSCORE 21.6 ± 5.5 P < 0.001). Repeat angiography was performed in 88 (55.7%) patients. Seven (4.4%) patients had in-stent restenosis; three occurred in BMS (P = 0.06). Two patients underwent revascularization with CABG and five had successful repeat PCI.
Conclusion:
In this on-going registry of high risk patients with LMCA stenosis, stenting was found to be safe and clinically effective in maintaining event-free survival.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care