Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
[Assessing aggressive behaviour at the psychiatric emergency service with a checklist: a replication study]
E J M Penterman1, H L I Nijman, K Saalmink
1ejm.penterman@ggzoosbrabant.nl
Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie
|February 15, 2013
Summary
The Checklist of Risks/ Crisis team (CRC) effectively predicts aggressive patient behavior in psychiatric emergencies. This validated tool enhances staff safety by identifying high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Previous research indicated the Checklist of Risks/ Crisis team (CRC) could predict aggressive patient behavior.
- A need for a larger, replicated study to validate these initial findings was identified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate circumstances surrounding patient contact with crisis teams.
- To assess the predictive validity of the CRC for aggressive behavior.
Main Methods:
- The CRC was completed by staff before community outreach visits over four years (2006-2009).
- Aggressive incidents during visits were documented using the Staff Observation Aggression Scale-Revised (SOAS-r).
Main Results:
- The CRC's visual analogue scale (VAS) and an item on dangerous persons in the vicinity predicted future aggression.
- Correct classification rates for aggression prediction were 91% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions:
- The CRC, SOAS-r, and regular incident discussions are valuable for analyzing incidents and improving staff safety.
- Implemented methods correlated with a reduction in aggressive acts against psychiatric emergency services staff.
