Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Better by design: rethinking interventions for better environmental regulation
C M Taylor1, S J T Pollard, A J Angus
1Cranfield University, Centre for Environmental Risks and Futures, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
Policy makers use diverse regulatory instruments to achieve environmental goals, with effectiveness varying by context. Direct regulation addresses risks, while co-regulation manages uncertainty and fosters collaboration.
Area of Science:
- Environmental policy and regulation
- Public administration
- Behavioral economics
Background:
- Effective environmental regulation aims for optimal outcomes with minimal burden.
- A gap exists in understanding the efficacy of different policy instruments and their contextual application.
- Non-governmental resources are increasingly leveraged to promote environmentally sound behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how policymakers select regulatory instruments.
- To analyze the factors influencing instrument choice within a specific governmental department.
- To understand the interplay between policy objectives, industry characteristics, and regulatory approaches.
Main Methods:
- A case study approach was employed, focusing on the UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
- A sample of 33 policymakers was interviewed or surveyed regarding their selection of policy and regulatory instruments.
- Analysis involved examining the relevance of various instruments based on risk and industry-specific factors.
Main Results:
- Policymakers utilize a broad spectrum of regulatory tools to achieve environmental targets.
- The selection and relevance of instruments are contingent upon specific policy areas, risk assessments, and industry attributes.
- Direct regulation is deemed essential for mitigating environmental risks and addressing non-compliance.
- Co-regulatory approaches offer flexibility for novel environmental challenges, facilitating evidence development and adaptive management.
Conclusions:
- No single regulatory instrument guarantees all environmental outcomes; a tailored approach is necessary.
- Direct regulation provides certainty in managing environmental risks and performance.
- Co-regulation is valuable for navigating uncertainty in emerging environmental issues and building consensus.
- Understanding the context-specific relevance of policy instruments is crucial for effective environmental governance.
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Global Regulatory Systems
Self-Regulation
