Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The James-Lange theory of emotions: A misnomer we should abandon.

History of psychology·2026

Same author

Cognitive performance after stroke at a young age from a brain network perspective.

Trends in neurosciences·2026

Same author

The Impact of Brain Tumors and Craniotomy Lesions on Scalp EEG.

Brain topography·2026

Same author

Lesion locations are associated with cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke in young adults.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026

Same author

The use of discourse particles in oral picture description by individuals with primary progressive aphasia.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Same author

Neural Oscillations in the Aging Brain Associated With Interference Control in Word Production.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming.

Vitória Piai¹, Ardi Roelofs

¹Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Montessorilaan 3, 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands. v.piai@donders.ru.nl

Acta Psychologica

|February 20, 2013

Summary

Dual-task interference in picture naming, where one task involves tone discrimination, is not passive queuing. Individual differences in working memory updating capacity support active scheduling of cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Dual-task interference in language processing lacks consensus regarding its underlying mechanism.
Theories propose either passive queuing or active scheduling of cognitive tasks.
Understanding this interference is crucial for cognitive architecture models.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether dual-task interference in picture naming is better explained by passive queuing or active scheduling.
To examine the relationship between individual differences in working memory updating and dual-task interference magnitude.

Main Methods:

Participants performed picture naming concurrently with a tone discrimination task.
Individual differences in working memory updating capacity were assessed using the operation-span task.
Correlation analysis was used to link working memory updating ability with naming speed and interference levels.

Main Results:

Working memory updating ability positively correlated with the speed of picture naming.
Higher updating/monitoring ability was associated with greater dual-task interference in picture naming.
These findings indicate a role for executive functions in managing dual-task performance.

Conclusions:

The results support an active-scheduling account of dual-task interference in language performance.
Individual differences in working memory updating capacity influence how cognitive tasks are managed under dual-task conditions.
This study contributes to understanding the cognitive control mechanisms underlying dual-tasking.