Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

M E Warchol1, P Dallos

  • 1Auditory Physiology Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The remarkable cochlear amplifier.

Hearing research·2010
Same author

Evaluation of an independent prestin mouse model derived from the 129S1 strain.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2007
Same author

Cochlear function in mice with only one copy of the prestin gene.

The Journal of physiology·2005
Same author

Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice.

The Journal of physiology·2004
Same author

Intracellular calcium and outer hair cell electromotility.

Brain research·2001
Same author

Ongoing cell death and immune influences on regeneration in the vestibular sensory organs.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2001
Same journal

Erratum: journal of comparative physiology a (1999) 184: 481-488.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2014
Same journal

Online first publication.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2014
Same journal

Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. II. The effects of cross-adapting backgrounds depend on spectral tuning.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2012
Same journal

Acetylcholine activates a chloride channel as well as glutamate and GABA.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2011
Same journal

Pharmacological brain stimulation releases elaborate stridulatory behaviour in gomphocerine grasshoppers--conclusions for the organization of the central nervous control.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2004
Same journal

Presynaptic effects of octopamine, serotonin, and cocktails of the two modulators on neuromuscular transmission in crustaceans.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2004
See all related articles

The chick cochlear nucleus divisions, nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis (NM), show distinct neural response patterns. NM neurons exhibit high spontaneous rates and primary-like responses, suggesting temporal coding, while NA neurons show varied responses, indicating intensity coding.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Comparative Neuroscience

Background:

  • The chick cochlear nucleus has two divisions: nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis (NM).
  • Understanding functional segregation between NA and NM is crucial for auditory processing research.
  • Previous studies suggest potential differences in coding temporal versus intensity information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify functional differences between NA and NM in chicks.
  • To investigate if NA and NM code for separate sound features like temporal information and intensity.
  • To compare chick auditory processing with that of other species, such as barn owls.

Main Methods:

  • Physiological recordings of single-unit activity in chick NA and NM.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evoked responses to sound stimuli were analyzed.
  • Quantification of spontaneous activity, frequency tuning curves, rate-intensity functions, and neural response patterns (choppers, primary-like, onset).
  • Assessment of neural phase-locking to auditory stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • NA and NM exhibit different spontaneous activity patterns (low in NA, high in NM).
    • NA units are more sensitive to sound thresholds than NM units.
    • NM units show monotonic rate-intensity functions, while 22% of NA units show nonmonotonic responses.
    • NA units display diverse response types (choppers, primary-like, onset) based on characteristic frequency, whereas NM units are primarily primary-like.
    • Neural phase-locking is strong in both nuclei below 1000 Hz, but extends to higher frequencies (2000 Hz) in NM compared to NA.

    Conclusions:

    • NM and NA neurons exhibit distinct physiological properties.
    • Findings support the hypothesis of functional segregation, with NM potentially involved in temporal coding and NA in intensity coding.
    • This segregation in chick auditory pathways parallels that observed in other species, suggesting conserved principles of auditory processing.