Is the water footprint an appropriate tool for forestry and forest products: the Fennoscandian case
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Samuli Launiainen1, Martyn N Futter, David Ellison
1Joensuu Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 68, 80101, Joensuu, Finland, samuli.launiainen@metla.fi.
Abstract:
The water footprint by the Water Footprint Network (WF) is an ambitious tool for measuring human appropriation and promoting sustainable use of fresh water. Using recent case studies and examples from water-abundant Fennoscandia, we consider whether it is an appropriate tool for evaluating the water use of forestry and forest-based products. We show that aggregating catchment level water consumption over a product life cycle does not consider fresh water as a renewable resource and is inconsistent with the principles of the hydrologic cycle. Currently, the WF assumes that all evapotranspiration (ET) from forests is a human appropriation of water although ET from managed forests in Fennoscandia is indistinguishable from that of unmanaged forests. We suggest that ET should not be included in the water footprint of rain-fed forestry and forest-based products. Tools for sustainable water management should always contextualize water use and water impacts with local water availability and environmental sensitivity.
Related Concept Videos
Softwoods and Hardwoods
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

