Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

People are sensitive to environmental predictability when engaging cognitive control.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same author

Matching contexts matters: Evidence for cross-paradigm transfer of cognitive control strategies.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025

Same author

Social identity switching: An investigation of non-demographic identities with computational-linguistic and self-report measures.

The British journal of social psychology·2025

Same author

The effect of preparation on binding between spatial and non-spatial features of voices in a multitalker setting.

Psychological research·2025

Same author

Preparatory Switches of Auditory Spatial and Non-Spatial Attention Among Simultaneous Voices.

Journal of cognition·2025

Same author

No evidence for cross-paradigm transfer of abstract task knowledge in adults and school-aged children.

Memory & cognition·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?

Félice van 't Wout¹, Aureliu Lavric, Stephen Monsell

¹School of Psychology, University of Exeter.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|February 21, 2013

Summary

Phonological working memory does not appear to represent stimulus-response rules for task-set control. Once learned, these rules are likely stored in procedural working memory, not declarative phonological working memory.

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Task-set control involves activating specific stimulus-response (S-R) rules.
The representation of these rules in an active state is not fully understood.
Phonological working memory is a candidate for representing these S-R rules.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if phonological working memory represents S-R rules for task-set control.
To examine the role of articulatory duration and phonological similarity of stimulus terms.

Main Methods:

Three task-cuing experiments were conducted.
Participants switched between two sets of arbitrary S-R rules.
Stimulus term properties (duration, phonological similarity) were manipulated.

Main Results:

Neither duration nor phonological similarity affected performance or task-switch costs after practice.
Phonological similarity only impacted performance during initial single-task training.
No detectable effects on overall performance, task-switch cost, or its reduction with preparation were observed.

Conclusions:

Phonological working memory plays no significant functional role in representing S-R rules for task-set control beyond a transient phase.
Learned S-R rules are likely represented in nonlinguistic procedural working memory.