Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Close Relationships and Culture01:29

Close Relationships and Culture

Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
Desirable Characteristics in Others01:26

Desirable Characteristics in Others

Various factors, including the type of relationship, gender, and duration of the relationship, influence the perception of desirable characteristics in others. While certain traits such as trustworthiness, cooperativeness, agreeableness, and extraversion are universally valued across all relationships, other characteristics are context-dependent and gain prominence based on specific relational dynamics.Universal and Context-Dependent TraitsTrustworthiness and cooperativeness are fundamental...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Awareness shapes fairness: how Children's emotion atributions reflect sensitivity to unequal treatment.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Trusting Wisely? Developmental Changes in How Children Learn and Adapt to Partner Trustworthiness.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

The role of future planning, patience, and risk tolerance for prospective reciprocity in human adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Descriptive norms influence children's injunctive and moral norm beliefs.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

US and Korean children prefer equality, but Korean children are more tolerant of ingroup-favoring allocations.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same journal

The cognitive foundations of children's culture.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Let the kids play: Children's folklore, Newell's paradox, and the triviality barrier.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Variable cultural acquisition costs may explain contextual variation in peer cultures.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

What's special about peer cultures? The opportunity for disagreement.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The adaptive role of peer culture is shaped by risk landscapes.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hidden cultures: How parental control shapes children's cultural adaptation in East Asian societies.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

From partner choice to equity - and beyond?

Felix Warneken1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. warneken@wjh.harvard.edu

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|March 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Morality may arise from cooperation dynamics. Human fairness uniquely prioritizes the needy, even over merit, distinguishing our moral cognition from other primates.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Primate behavior
  • Moral cognition

Background:

  • Theories of morality often focus on social norms and punishment.
  • Baumard et al. proposed morality emerges from partner choice in mutualistic interactions.
  • Existing models may not fully explain the human specificity of moral cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate Baumard et al.'s model of morality's emergence from mutualistic interactions.
  • To explore evidence from human and nonhuman primates supporting this model.
  • To identify and address gaps in explaining human moral uniqueness.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of existing evidence from primatology and human studies.
  • Comparative analysis of moral cognition across species.
  • Theoretical modeling of fairness and welfare considerations.

Main Results:

  • Evidence from human and nonhuman primates supports the general framework of morality emerging from mutualistic interactions.
  • A key gap exists in explaining the specific characteristics of human moral cognition.
  • Human fairness appears to uniquely involve overriding merit-based considerations to aid the needy.

Conclusions:

  • The model of morality emerging from partner choice in mutualistic interactions provides a valuable framework.
  • Human moral cognition is distinct, characterized by a unique emphasis on welfare for the needy.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the evolutionary and cognitive underpinnings of human fairness.