[Molecular typing methods for infection monitoring and control]

Molecular typing methods are useful in the surveillance and control of nosocomial outbreaks because they can provide information on the clonal relatedness among isolates, identify reservoirs, and determine routes of transmission. The gold standard assay for molecular typing is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) due to its high discriminatory power. Some major disadvantages of PFGE include the high cost of the equipment, its labor intensiveness (the technique is not automated) and the time required to analyze the profiles of DNA bands (pulsotypes). Although there are many molecular typing methods based on polymerase-chain reaction (PCR), the most widely used is repetitive sequence-based PCR (REP-PCR). Most of the PCR techniques used for molecular typing have none of the limitations of PFGE as they are less expensive and labor intensive (some, such as bioMérieux's Diversilab system, are commercially available) and generate DNA profiles that are easier to interpret, depending on the microorganism. The discriminatory power of PCR is generally lower than or similar to that of PFGE. Both PFGE and PCR require optimal laboratory standardization to guarantee good reproducibility. PCR methods are preferable in the study of small, timelimited outbreaks. In more complex outbreaks of longer duration, in which clonal evolution and dynamics are studied, the use of PFGE is preferable. Molecular typing methods based on DNA sequencing, such as multilocus sequence typing, are applicable in global epidemiological studies or in analyses of the population structure of microorganisms.