Malaria transmission after artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine: a randomized trial

Patrick Sawa1, Seif A Shekalaghe, Chris J Drakeley

  • 1Human Health Division, International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology, Mbita Point, Nairobi, Kenya.

Insights

Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) showed lower malaria transmission to mosquitoes compared to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). DP provided longer protection, but AL reduced gametocyte carriage more effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Malariology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Parasitology

Background:

  • Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is crucial for reducing malaria transmission.
  • The comparative impact of different ACTs on malaria transmission remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) on malaria transmission in children.
  • To evaluate gametocyte carriage and infectiousness after treatment with AL versus DP.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial involving 298 children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kenya.
  • Comparison of AL and DP treatments.
  • Molecular methods and mosquito-feeding assays to assess gametocyte carriage and infectiousness.

Main Results:

  • Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) showed a significantly lower risk of recurrent parasitemia (3.7%) compared to artemether-lumefantrine (AL) (20.7%).
  • Mean gametocyte carriage duration was longer with DP (15.3 days) than AL (5.5 days).
  • Malaria transmission to mosquitoes was lower from AL-treated children, though not statistically significant (P = .06), but oocyst burden was significantly lower (P = .005).

Conclusions:

  • Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) offers a longer prophylactic period post-treatment.
  • Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) demonstrates a greater reduction in gametocyte carriage and subsequent malaria transmission to mosquitoes.
Abstract