Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Joint Effect of Paternal and Maternal Age on the Prevalence of Low Birth Weight in the United States.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same author

First-degree family history of cancers in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma. Prevalence and prognostic impact.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2024
Same author

Racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation and survival of breast cancer by subtype.

Frontiers in oncology·2024
Same author

Mediation Analysis of Maternal Smoking, Gestational Age, and Birth Weight on the Texas-Mexico Border.

Southern medical journal·2023
Same author

Sex and diet-dependent gene alterations in human and rat brains with a history of nicotine exposure.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2023
Same author

An Evacuation Simulation in Multiple Neonatal Intensive Care Units Across a Single City: Lessons Learned.

Disaster medicine and public health preparedness·2022
Same journal

Radon Exposure as an Occupational Hazard and Environmental Risk Factor for Lung Cancer in Utah: Assessment, Mitigation, and Policy Implications.

Journal of registry management·2026
Same journal

Preliminary Estimates of New Invasive Cancers Diagnosed in 2023 in the United States.

Journal of registry management·2026
Same journal

Validation of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Identifying Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight Infants in Florida Birth Hospitalizations, 2008-2018.

Journal of registry management·2026
Same journal

Letter from the Editor.

Journal of registry management·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Cancer Cases Reported through Inter-Registry Data Exchange in New York State.

Journal of registry management·2026
Same journal

The Population Cancer Assessment and Surveillance Engine (PopCASE): An Emerging Population Cancer Data Platform.

Journal of registry management·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Avoiding sparse data bias: an example from gynecologic oncology.

Norma P Fernandez, Zuber D Mulla

    Journal of Registry Management
    |March 16, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    For rare cancers like ovarian carcinosarcoma, standard logistic regression may fail. Bayesian, exact, and penalized logistic regression are effective alternatives for analyzing sparse data in medical research.

    More Related Videos

    Strategy for Biobanking of Ovarian Cancer Organoids: Addressing the Interpatient Heterogeneity across Histological Subtypes and Disease Stages
    08:26

    Strategy for Biobanking of Ovarian Cancer Organoids: Addressing the Interpatient Heterogeneity across Histological Subtypes and Disease Stages

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 13, 2026

    Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
    10:35

    Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

    Published on: April 17, 2012

    Strategy for Biobanking of Ovarian Cancer Organoids: Addressing the Interpatient Heterogeneity across Histological Subtypes and Disease Stages
    08:26

    Strategy for Biobanking of Ovarian Cancer Organoids: Addressing the Interpatient Heterogeneity across Histological Subtypes and Disease Stages

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Oncology

    Background:

    • Sparse data in medical research often challenges standard statistical methods.
    • Ordinary logistic regression relies on large-sample approximations, which may not be suitable for rare diseases or small sample sizes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and compare three statistical techniques for analyzing sparse data.
    • To evaluate Bayesian logistic regression, exact logistic regression, and penalized maximum likelihood estimation as alternatives to ordinary logistic regression.

    Main Methods:

    • A cross-sectional study analyzed ovarian carcinosarcoma cases from the Texas Cancer Registry (1995-2006).
    • Race (white vs. black) was the exposure, and distant metastasis at diagnosis was the outcome.
    • Bayesian logistic regression, exact logistic regression, and penalized maximum likelihood estimation were used due to small sample size and unbalanced outcome.

    Main Results:

    • The study included 52 women (47 white, 5 black) with ovarian carcinosarcoma.
    • No statistically significant differences in distant metastasis were found between racial groups.
    • Bayesian analysis yielded an odds ratio (1.16) closest to the null value compared to exact (1.24) and penalized (1.31) models.

    Conclusions:

    • Ordinary logistic regression is often inappropriate for sparse data encountered in rare disease research.
    • Bayesian analysis, exact logistic regression, and penalized maximum likelihood estimation are valuable alternative strategies.
    • These methods provide more reliable results when sample sizes are small and outcomes are unbalanced.