Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects01:12

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects

While local anesthetics are generally safe and well-tolerated, they can occasionally cause adverse effects that vary in severity. Local anesthetics can induce toxicity at two distinct levels. They can either produce local effects through direct contact with the neural elements or be absorbed into the bloodstream from the injection site, leading to systemic effects.
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers01:24

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changing the narrative: stories reduce biases against anomalous faces.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Going Beyond Beauty: Characterizing the Complexity of Aesthetic Experiences.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Who Do We Remember? Facial Anomalies, Race, and Sex in Social Categorization.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Testing the art as adaptation hypothesis through artistic practice and reproductive success in Papua woodcarvers.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The curious case of Cortex covers.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness
04:04

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: July 11, 2025

Neuroaesthetics: range and restrictions.

Anjan Chatterjee1

  • 1Department of Neurology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19147, USA. anjan@mail.med.upenn.edu

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|March 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Scientific aesthetics and art history share tensions, but Bullot & Reber’s critique is overstated. Their proposed solutions for integrating scientific aesthetics into art history are incomplete, overlooking its potential and limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Aesthetics
  • Art History
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Tensions exist between scientific aesthetics and art history.
  • The integration of these fields is a timely and relevant discussion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the claims made by Bullot & Reber regarding scientific aesthetics and art history.
  • To assess the proposed solutions for interdisciplinary learning between these fields.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing literature on scientific aesthetics and art history.
  • Evaluation of Bullot & Reber's arguments and proposed solutions.

Main Results:

  • Bullot & Reber's diagnosis of the problem is exaggerated.

More Related Videos

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques
06:21

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques

Published on: May 7, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness
04:04

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: July 11, 2025

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques
06:21

Adaptable Angled Stereotactic Approach for Versatile Neuroscience Techniques

Published on: May 7, 2020

  • Their proposed solutions are partial and do not fully address the complexities.
  • The reach of scientific aesthetics is underestimated, and its inherent restrictions are not identified.

    • Conclusions:

    • While commending the highlighting of tensions, the critique of Bullot & Reber's work suggests a need for more nuanced understanding.
    • Further research should explore the full potential and limitations of scientific aesthetics in dialogue with art history.