Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
Published on: August 12, 2019
Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.
Christian Riedelsheimer1, Jeffrey B Endelman, Michael Stange
1Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Optimizing genomic selection (GS) training sets (TS) in maize breeding requires careful population structuring. Including related lines, like full-sibs, in the TS is crucial for accurate progeny prediction, while unrelated lines can reduce accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Plant breeding and genetics
- Quantitative genetics
- Genomic selection
Background:
- Designing effective training sets (TS) is critical for genomic selection (GS) in structured plant breeding populations.
- Understanding how to best construct a TS from multiple related or unrelated biparental families to predict progeny from individual crosses remains an open question.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the impact of training set composition on prediction accuracy in genomic selection.
- To evaluate how different types of relatedness (full-sibs, half-sibs, unrelated) within the TS influence prediction of progeny from individual crosses in maize.
Main Methods:
- Utilized five interconnected maize (Zea mays L.) doubled-haploid (DH) line populations derived from four parents.
- Genotyped 635 DH lines with 16,741 polymorphic SNPs and evaluated five traits, including Gibberella ear rot and kernel yield components.
- Analyzed genomic similarity patterns to define relationships (full-sibs, half-sibs, unrelated) and assessed prediction accuracies based on TS composition.
Main Results:
- Prediction accuracies within full-sib families closely matched theoretical expectations.
- Replacing full-sibs with half-sibs in the TS decreased prediction accuracies by 42%, but using half-sibs from both parents of the validation population improved results.
- Including unrelated crosses with opposite linkage phases negatively impacted prediction accuracy, suggesting their exclusion from the TS.
Conclusions:
- The genomic relatedness of lines within the training set significantly influences prediction accuracy in genomic selection.
- Prioritizing related individuals, particularly full-sibs, and excluding unrelated lines with unfavorable linkage phases are recommended for optimizing TS design.
- Trait and population variability necessitate adaptive strategies for resource allocation in genomic selection model development.
Related Concept Videos
Dihybrid Crosses
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Monohybrid Crosses
Monohybrid Crosses
Law of Segregation
Law of Independent Assortment

