Prospective study using a new bulking agent for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: polyacrylamide hydrogel

Jonathan Cloutier1, Anne-Sophie Blais, Katherine Moore

  • 1Division of Urology, Quebec University Hospital Center, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

The Journal of Urology
|March 30, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Polyacrylamide hydrogel shows promising short-term success for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This endoscopic treatment offers an effective alternative, comparable to other agents, for managing VUR in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is common in children, often managed with endoscopic treatments.
  • Current endoscopic bulking agents have high costs, prompting investigation into alternatives.
  • Polyacrylamide hydrogel presents a potential cost-effective option for VUR treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and success rates of polyacrylamide hydrogel for endoscopic treatment of VUR in a pediatric cohort.
  • To assess the feasibility of using polyacrylamide hydrogel as a first-line therapy for VUR.
  • To compare the outcomes of polyacrylamide hydrogel with established bulking agents.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, single-center, off-label study involving 40 pediatric patients with VUR.
  • Endoscopic subureteral double hydrodistention implantation using polyacrylamide hydrogel.
  • Postoperative assessment at 3 months included renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram to confirm VUR resolution.

Main Results:

  • Successful VUR correction in 87% for low-grade (I-III) and 81.2% overall after a single treatment.
  • The study included 69 refluxing ureters in 40 patients, with a median age of 50 months.
  • Mean injected volume was 1.1 ml, with various grades of VUR treated.

Conclusions:

  • Off-label polyacrylamide hydrogel injection is effective for low-grade pediatric VUR.
  • Short-term success rates are comparable to dextranomer/hyaluronic acid.
  • Further comparative trials of polyacrylamide hydrogel and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid are warranted.
Abstract