Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Generation of Alginate Microspheres for Biomedical Applications
Published on: August 12, 2012
Dimensional changes of extended-pour alginate impression materials.
John A Todd1, Larry J Oesterle, Sheldon M Newman
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
This study tested how well different alginate impression materials hold their shape over time and under different temperatures. The researchers compared two newer extended-pour alginates with two traditional ones and a vinyl polysiloxane. They made impressions of a scored aluminum die and measured the distance between the score lines at 10 minutes, 24 hours, and 100 hours. They also tested how temperature affected the materials by storing them at cold (-9°C), room (22°C), and hot (46°C) temperatures. All alginates showed significant dimensional changes at 24 and 100 hours. The most stable materials were Kromopan and Kromatica, while Triphasix and Jeltrate were the least stable. Cold storage led to the largest changes, and room temperature was the most stable. The vinyl polysiloxane showed no significant changes. The study suggests that extended-pour alginates may not be as stable as manufacturers claim and that storage conditions play a key role in dimensional accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Impression material stability
- Dental laboratory techniques
Background:
Dental impressions require consistent dimensions to ensure accurate model fabrication. Manufacturers now claim extended stability for alginate materials, allowing delayed shipping to labs. Prior research has shown that traditional alginates undergo dimensional changes over time. However, no prior work had resolved how newer extended-pour alginates perform under different storage conditions. This gap motivated the current evaluation of dimensional stability across time and temperature. It was already known that storage conditions affect material behavior. The uncertainty remained about whether extended-pour alginates truly maintain accuracy for 100 hours. No prior work had resolved the comparative performance of these newer materials. This study aimed to address that uncertainty.
Purpose Of The Study:
The goal was to assess dimensional changes in extended-pour and traditional alginate impression materials. The researchers wanted to test if these materials maintain accuracy for 100 hours. They focused on storage temperature and time as variables. The study compared two extended-pour alginates with two traditional ones and a vinyl polysiloxane. The specific problem was whether these materials could reliably support digital model fabrication. The motivation came from claims made by manufacturers about extended stability. No prior work had resolved the impact of cold, room, or hot storage on these materials. The researchers aimed to clarify their real-world performance.
Main Methods:
Five impression materials were tested: two extended-pour alginates, two traditional alginates, and one vinyl polysiloxane. Impressions were made using a scored aluminum die. The distance between score lines was measured at 10 minutes, 24 hours, and 100 hours. Storage conditions included cold (-9°C), room (22°C), and hot (46°C) temperatures for 8 hours. The researchers calculated percentage changes in dimensions. Statistical analysis was used to determine significance. The study design allowed comparison across time and temperature. The approach focused on measurable dimensional accuracy.
Main Results:
All alginates showed significant dimensional changes at 24 and 100 hours (0.69%-6.13%). VP Mix showed no significant changes in any condition. Kromopan and Kromatica had the smallest changes at 100 hours (0.85%-2.22%). Triphasix and Jeltrate had the highest changes (1.53%-4.73%). Cold storage led to the largest changes (1.96%-4.73%). Room temperature resulted in the smallest changes (0.97%-1.53%). The differences between materials and conditions were statistically significant. These findings suggest that storage conditions heavily influence material stability.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest that all alginates in the study undergo significant dimensional changes over time. They note that extended-pour alginates do not guarantee 100-hour stability. The researchers propose that cold storage increases instability in these materials. They suggest that room temperature may be the most favorable condition. The findings indicate that storage temperature and time are critical variables. The authors suggest that manufacturers' claims may not reflect real-world performance. They propose that further testing is needed to confirm these results. The study highlights the importance of controlled storage for accurate impressions.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study found that all alginates, including extended-pour types, showed significant dimensional changes at 24 and 100 hours.
Kromopan (extended-pour) and Kromatica (traditional) had the smallest changes at 100 hours (0.85%-2.22%).
Cold storage (-9°C) resulted in the highest dimensional changes (1.96%-4.73%) compared to room or hot storage.
VP Mix showed no significant dimensional changes under any storage condition, serving as a stable control.
Changes were measured at 10 minutes, 24 hours, and 100 hours after mixing the impression materials.
The authors suggest that these claims may not reflect real-world performance, as all alginates changed significantly over time.

