Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory: a randomized controlled trial
Erin Freed1, Debra Long, Tonantzin Rodriguez
1Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, USA.
Objective:
To compare the effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory, a key aspect of comprehension.
Methods:
Randomized controlled trial (N=60), comparing the effects of experimental and control colorectal cancer (CRC) screening texts on recognition memory, measured using a statement recognition test, accounting for response bias (score range -0.91 to 5.34). The experimental text had a lower Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level (7.4 versus 9.6), was more focused on addressing screening barriers, and employed more comparative tables than the control text.
Results:
Recognition memory was higher in the experimental group (2.54 versus 1.09, t=-3.63, P=0.001), including after adjustment for age, education, and health literacy (β=0.42, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.68, P=0.001), and in analyses limited to persons with college degrees (β=0.52, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.86, P=0.004) or no self-reported health literacy problems (β=0.39, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.71, P=0.02).
Conclusion:
An experimental CRC screening text improved recognition memory, including among patients with high education and self-assessed health literacy.
Practice Implications:
CRC screening texts comparable to our experimental text may be warranted for all screening-eligible patients, if such texts improve screening uptake.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Blinding
