Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan, jkobayas@hsp.ncvc.go.jp.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD), especially after prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). TAVI offers a potentially safer alternative to traditional surgery in these complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexists with aortic stenosis (AS), affecting 40-50% of patients with typical angina.
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) guidelines have evolved for AS in high-comorbidity patients.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended for significant coronary stenosis, with over 60% performed off-pump in Japan.
Purpose of the Study:
- To delineate the rationale for TAVI in patients with severe AS and concomitant CAD.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAVI in patients with varying degrees of CAD.
- To explore the role of TAVI in patients with prior CABG and patent internal thoracic arteries.
Main Methods:
- Review of current guidelines and clinical evidence regarding TAVI and surgical interventions for AS and CAD.
- Analysis of operative risks and long-term outcomes associated with prophylactic aortic valve replacement (AVR) during CABG.
- Assessment of TAVI as an alternative for patients with severe AS and prior CABG, particularly with patent internal thoracic arteries.
Main Results:
- Prophylactic AVR for moderate AS during CABG may increase early operative risks and long-term complications.
- AVR after previous CABG carries significant risks, including potential injury to the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and challenges in myocardial protection.
- Severe AS with prior CABG and a patent LITA is a strong indication for TAVI.
Conclusions:
- TAVI is a definite indication for patients with severe AS and prior CABG with a patent LITA.
- The safety of TAVI across diverse CAD extents and anatomies requires further investigation.
- Hybrid TAVI approaches may offer reduced mortality and morbidity for high-risk patients in the future.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is combined with aortic stenosis (AS) in 40-50 % of patients with typical angina. Recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has changed the guideline for AS in patients with high comorbidity. At the same time more than 60 % of isolated CABG has been performed without cardiopulmonary bypass in Japan. CABG is recommended and should be considered in patients with primary indication for AVR and luminal stenosis >70 % in major coronary arteries and the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) by guidelines. AVR is indicated for severe AS undergoing CABG. It is generally accepted to perform AVR for moderate AS at the time of CABG by valve guidelines. However, prophylactic AVR for moderate AS associated with CABG may increase the early operative risk and expose the patients to postoperative long-term valve related complications. AVR after previous CABG poses potential risk for mortality and morbidity. The presence of patent ITA is a significant risk of its injury and difficulty of myocardial protection during aortic cross-clamping. Therefore, at present, for severe AS previous CABG with patent ITA should be one of the definite indications of TAVI. Rationale of TAVI in patients with severe AS and CAD has not been clearly delineated. The safety of TAVI irrespective of the extent and anatomy of CAD is still controversial. PCI is not appropriate before TAVI in high-risk patients with CAD. In the near future hybrid TAVI will be realistic considering least operative mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care