Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
Published on: November 6, 2014
Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis
Zaneta M Thayer1, Seth D Dobson
1Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. zane@u.northwestern.edu
Abstract:
The universal facial attractiveness (UFA) hypothesis proposes that some facial features are universally preferred because they are reliable signals of mate quality. The primary evidence for this hypothesis comes from cross-cultural studies of perceived attractiveness. However, these studies do not directly address patterns of morphological variation at the population level. An unanswered question is therefore: Are universally preferred facial phenotypes geographically invariant, as the UFA hypothesis implies? The purpose of our study is to evaluate this often overlooked aspect of the UFA hypothesis by examining patterns of geographic variation in chin shape. We collected symphyseal outlines from 180 recent human mandibles (90 male, 90 female) representing nine geographic regions. Elliptical Fourier functions analysis was used to quantify chin shape, and principle components analysis was used to compute shape descriptors. In contrast to the expectations of the UFA hypothesis, we found significant geographic differences in male and female chin shape. These findings are consistent with region-specific sexual selection and/or random genetic drift, but not universal sexual selection. We recommend that future studies of facial attractiveness take into consideration patterns of morphological variation within and between diverse human populations.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Relationship Formation
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
Emotional Expression
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...