Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Electrophonic hearing and cochlear implants.

A Risberg¹, E Agelfors, B Lindström

¹Department of Speech Communication and Music Acoustics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.

Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum

|January 1, 1990

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Urinary oxytocin levels in children meeting a Hospital Dog<sup>®</sup>.

BMC complementary medicine and therapies·2025

Same author

It Is Not Shampooing Alone That Makes a Certified Hospital Dog Safe for Patient Care.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2025

Same author

Negligible Allergen Presence in Hospital Dogs After Washing.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2025

Same author

Two-dimensional, M-mode and left atrial velocity echocardiographic measurements in healthy Norwegian-Swedish Coldblooded Trotters.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2020

Same author

Discussion of the Psychophysics of Hearing Aids.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020

Same author

Long-term Data from the Swedish National Environmental Monitoring Program of Pesticides in Surface Waters.

Journal of environmental quality·2019

Same journal

Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2013

Same journal

Inner ear drug delivery system from the clinical point of view.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Hydrogen protects vestibular hair cells from free radicals.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Distribution of bone marrow-derived cells in the vestibular end organs and the endolymphatic sac.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

Impacts and limitations of medialization thyroplasty on swallowing function of patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

Same journal

A tissue-engineering approach for stenosis of the trachea and/or cricoid.

Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum·2010

See all related articles

Two auditory sensations, electrophonic and electro-neural, may explain varied cochlear implant outcomes. This hypothesis impacts patient selection and device strategy for hearing restoration.

Area of Science:

Audiology
Biomedical Engineering
Neuroscience

Background:

Varied speech understanding results in cochlear implant patients using single-channel devices are not fully explained.
Existing hypotheses do not account for the range of outcomes observed with similar implant systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a dual-component auditory sensation hypothesis (electrophonic and electro-neural) to explain variable cochlear implant outcomes.
To discuss the implications of this hypothesis for patient selection, electrode type, and speech coding strategies.

Main Methods:

Review and discussion of published results from different cochlear implant studies.
Hypothetical model integrating electrophonic and electro-neural stimulation components.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The dual-component hypothesis offers a potential explanation for differing speech understanding levels in cochlear implant users.
Patient selection criteria, particularly regarding residual hair cell function, may significantly influence outcomes.

Conclusions:

The distinction between electrophonic and electro-neural stimulation is crucial for understanding cochlear implant efficacy.
Further research is needed to validate this hypothesis and refine patient selection and device programming for optimal hearing rehabilitation.