Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias
Valentina Kutyifa1, Anne-Catherine Pouleur, Dorit Knappe
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. valentina.kutyifa@heart.rochester.edu
Insights
Improving left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Baseline LV dyssynchrony did not predict these events in LBBB or non-LBBB patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony may contribute to ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients.
- Previous studies have not extensively evaluated dyssynchrony in large cohorts of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
- To evaluate the impact of CRT on LV dyssynchrony and subsequent arrhythmia risk in patients within the MADIT-CRT trial.
Main Methods:
- LV dyssynchrony assessed using speckle-tracking echocardiography (standard deviation of time to peak systolic strain in 12 LV segments) at baseline and 12 months.
- Primary endpoint was the first occurrence of VT/VF/death or VT/VF.
- Study population included 764 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and 312 without LBBB, treated with either ICD or CRT-D.
Main Results:
- Baseline LV dyssynchrony did not predict VT/VF/death or VT/VF in either LBBB or non-LBBB patients.
- In CRT-D patients with LBBB, improved LV dyssynchrony over one year correlated with significantly lower rates of VT/VF/death and VT/VF.
- A 15% decrease in LV dyssynchrony in LBBB patients was associated with reduced risk of VT/VF/death and VT/VF compared to ICD patients.
Conclusions:
- Baseline LV dyssynchrony is not a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in mild heart failure patients, irrespective of LBBB status.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced improvement in LV dyssynchrony significantly reduces ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients with LBBB.
Objectives:
The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial.
Background:
Intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony might be an important factor in ventricular arrhythmogenesis by enhancing electrical heterogeneity in heart failure patients. The effects of dyssynchrony have not yet been evaluated in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) patients.
Methods:
LV dyssynchrony was measured at baseline and at 12-months by speckle-tracking echocardiography, defined as the standard deviation of time to peak systolic strain in 12 LV myocardial segments. The endpoint was the first VT/VF/death or VT/VF. LV dyssynchrony was evaluated in 764 left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients and in 312 non-LBBB patients.
Results:
Baseline LV dyssynchrony was not predictive of VT/VF/death or VT/VF in LBBB or non-LBBB patients in either treatment arm. In CRT-D patients with LBBB, improvement in LV dyssynchrony over a year was associated with significantly lower incidence of VT/VF/death (p < 0.001) and VT/VF (p < 0.001) compared to ICD patients and to CRT-D patients with unchanged or worsening dyssynchrony. Among LBBB patients, 15% decrease in LV dyssynchrony was associated with lower risk of VT/VF/death (hazard ratio: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.99, p = 0.049) and VT/VF (hazard ratio: 0.30, 95% confidence interval: 0.12 to 0.77, p = 0.009) as compared to ICD patients. Patients without LBBB receiving CRT-D did not show reduction in VT/VF/death or in VT/VF in relation to improving dyssynchrony when evaluating cumulative event rates or risk of events.
Conclusions:
Baseline LV dyssynchrony did not predict VT/VF/death or VT/VF in mild heart failure patients with or without LBBB. CRT-induced improvement of LV dyssynchrony was associated with significant reduction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LBBB.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias I: Introduction
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
