Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Occupational radiation studies: status, problems, and prospects.

R E Shore1

  • 1New York University Medical Center, Institute of Environmental Medicine, NY 10010-2598.

Health Physics
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiation epidemiology and health effects following low-level radiation exposure.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2019
Same author

Reply to Comment on 'Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection'.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2019
Same author

Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2018
Same author

Dose-rate effects in radiation biology and radiation protection.

Annals of the ICRP·2016
Same author

A report from the 2013 international symposium: the evaluation of the effects of low-dose radiation exposure in the life span study of atomic bomb survivors and other similar studies.

Health physics·2015
Same author

A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident.

Radiation research·2014
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

Monitoring U.S. radiation workers is crucial for public health and radiation protection. Low-dose exposures present challenges in detecting cancer risks, necessitating advanced study methods and biological markers.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Radiation Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Large-scale mortality studies of U.S. radiation workers (N=350,000) are underway.
  • These studies are vital for public health, radiation protection, and validating risk models.
  • Interpreting low-dose radiation effects is challenging due to small expected effect magnitudes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To monitor the mortality experience of radiation workers, focusing on cancer incidence.
  • To provide a public health and radiation protection check on existing risk extrapolation models.
  • To identify challenges in low-dose radiation effect assessment and suggest future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal follow-up of a large cohort of radiation workers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of mortality data, specifically cancer outcomes.
  • Dose-effect analyses and pooled analyses across multiple studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Low doses complicate the detection of statistically significant radiation-induced health effects.
    • Distinguishing true effects from chance or bias in low-dose studies remains difficult.
    • Existing methods offer partial improvements but do not fully resolve interpretation issues.

    Conclusions:

    • Continued monitoring of radiation workers is essential for understanding low-dose risks.
    • Future research should focus on identifying biological markers for improved individual risk assessment.
    • Enhanced methods are needed to overcome the inherent challenges in studying low-dose radiation effects.