Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Interference between pacemakers/implantable cardioverter defibrillators and video capsule endoscopy
Dirk Bandorski1, Johannes Gehron, Reinhard Höltgen
1Dirk Bandorski, Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Giessen und Marburg GmbH, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
This letter highlights inaccuracies in a study on capsule endoscopy with pacemakers. Many patients lacked data on potential interference, and ECG interpretation was questioned.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is valuable for diagnosing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
- Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), present unique considerations for SBCE.
- Previous studies have explored the safety of SBCE in patients with CIEDs, but potential interference and data interpretation require careful review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the accuracy of information presented in a previous article regarding SBCE in patients with pacemakers and ICDs.
- To address specific discrepancies in device modes, telemetry monitoring, and electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation.
- To emphasize the importance of precise data for assessing the safety of SBCE in patients with CIEDs.
Main Methods:
- Review and critique of the data and discussion presented in the article by Cuschieri et al.
- Analysis of reported pacemaker/ICD modes and telemetry data.
- Re-evaluation of presented ECG tracings.
Main Results:
- Inaccuracies were identified in the reported pacemaker and ICD modes, with discrepancies between text and tables.
- A significant proportion of patients (45%) lacked crucial information regarding potential interference between SBCE and their CIEDs.
- An ECG finding was reinterpreted as an artifact rather than device undersensing.
Conclusions:
- The original study's discussion contained inaccuracies regarding CIED modes and potential interference during SBCE.
- Incomplete patient data and questionable ECG interpretation in the original article limit the conclusions that can be drawn.
- Accurate reporting and comprehensive data are essential for evaluating the safety of SBCE in patients with pacemakers and ICDs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

