Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

EEG-derived brain connectivity in theta/alpha frequency bands increases during reading of individual words.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2025
Same author

Anticipatory eye movements revisited: From affordances and actions to consequences and states.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Premises for digital twins reporting on Atlantic salmon wellbeing.

Behavioural processes·2025
Same author

Beyond the mosaic model of brain evolution: Rearing environment defines local and global plasticity.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2024
Same author

Widespread asymmetries of amygdala nuclei predict auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.

BMC psychiatry·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Language-guided visual processing affects reasoning: the role of referential and spatial anchoring.

Magda L Dumitru1, Gitte H Joergensen, Alice G Cruickshank

  • 1Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. magda.dumitru@gmail.com

Consciousness and Cognition
|April 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Language shapes visual perception, causing incremental processing that can lead to reasoning errors. This study shows how language influences our interpretation of visual scenes and decision-making.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Visual Cognition

Background:

  • Language influences cognitive processes beyond information retrieval.
  • The relationship between linguistic input and visual perception is not fully understood.
  • Incremental processing is a known feature of language comprehension.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how language affects visual processing during a reasoning task.
  • To examine the integration of visual and linguistic information.
  • To determine the consequences of language-induced visual processing on judgment.

Main Methods:

  • Participants listened to sentences with conjunctions/disjunctions while viewing visual scenes.
  • Visual scenes contained pictures that either matched or mismatched sentence nouns.
  • Referential and spatial anchoring effects on visual fixations and judgments were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Visual processing occurred incrementally, mirroring language processing.
  • Referential and spatial anchoring influenced participants' eye movements and judgments.
  • Mismatch between linguistic and visual information led to errors.

Conclusions:

  • Language induces incremental processing of visual scenes.
  • This incremental processing makes visual interpretation susceptible to reasoning errors.
  • The language-meaning verification process is influenced by visual input integration.