Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Bayesian method for synthesizing evidence. The Confidence Profile Method.

D M Eddy1, V Hasselblad, R Shachter

  • 1Duke University.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

The New England journal of medicine·2011
Same author

Racial differences in blood pressure response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in children: a meta-analysis.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2008
Same author

The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk: implications for clinical practice.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2008
Same author

Association of intradialytic blood pressure changes with hospitalization and mortality rates in prevalent ESRD patients.

Kidney international·2007
Same author

Initial experience with factor-Xa inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention: the XaNADU-PCI Pilot.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2004
Same author

Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making.

European heart journal·2003
Same journal

Measuring, Valuing, and Incorporating Patient and Caregiver Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations: A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

ASSESSING COST EFFECTIVENESS IN ONCOLOGY TREATMENT SEQUENCES: A REVIEW OF PATHWAY MODELLING METHODS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Policy Dialogue on Health Technology Assessment in Middle East and North Africa: Reporting from an HTAi initiative.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

What is new in the early health technology assessment's new definition?

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
Same journal

Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
See all related articles

Bayesian meta-analysis methods, including the Confidence Profile Method, offer robust techniques for health technology assessment. These methods synthesize diverse evidence to estimate key parameters and outcomes, providing comprehensive probability distributions for decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Health technology assessment
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence synthesis

Background:

  • Interpreting and combining evidence from various sources is crucial for health technology assessment.
  • Traditional meta-analysis methods may have limitations in handling diverse data types and biases.
  • Bayesian statistical approaches offer a flexible framework for complex evidence synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe Bayesian meta-analysis techniques for health technology assessment.
  • To introduce the Confidence Profile Method (CPM) for interpreting, adjusting, and combining evidence.
  • To outline the components required for CPM analysis, including prior distributions and likelihood functions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Bayesian statistics for meta-analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the Confidence Profile Method (CPM) to estimate parameters and outcomes.
  • Incorporating prior distributions, likelihood functions, and models for experimental designs.
  • Adjusting for biases within the analysis framework.

    • Main Results:

    • CPM yields a joint posterior probability distribution for parameters of interest.
    • Marginal distributions for specific parameters can be derived from the joint distribution.
    • The method accommodates various outcome types, effect measures, and experimental designs.
    • The approach allows for the adjustment of biases in evidence.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian meta-analysis, particularly CPM, provides a powerful tool for health technology assessment.
    • The method enables comprehensive analysis of complex evidence, including adjustments for biases.
    • CPM facilitates robust estimation of parameters and outcomes essential for decision-making in healthcare.