Using geographic methods to inform cancer screening interventions for South Asians in Ontario, Canada

Aisha K Lofters1, Piotr Gozdyra, Rebecca Lobb

  • 1Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. aisha.lofters@utoronto.ca

BMC Public Health
|April 30, 2013
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

South Asians in Ontario face lower cancer screening rates. Spatial analysis identified high-risk areas for targeted breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Geospatial Analysis
  • Health Equity

Background:

  • South Asians in Ontario, Canada, experience under-screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.
  • A community-engaged study aims to increase cancer screening rates within this demographic.
  • This research focuses on identifying optimal geographic areas for pilot interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To utilize visual displays of spatial analyses to pinpoint small geographic areas for targeted cancer screening interventions.
  • To identify census tracts with the greatest need for cancer screening interventions among South Asians in Ontario.

Main Methods:

  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) were employed.
  • Population-level administrative data were used to map cancer screening rates, South Asian population density, and healthcare facility locations.
  • Multi-layered maps were created for census tracts in the Peel Region and validated by partner organizations.

Main Results:

  • Lowest screening rates observed were 51.1% for cervical, 48.5% for breast, and 42.5% for colorectal cancer.
  • Lower screening rates were consistently associated with higher proportions of South Asian residents.
  • LISA analysis identified a high-risk area with low screening rates across all three cancer types and a significant South Asian population, validated by community partners.

Conclusions:

  • South Asians in Ontario are disproportionately located in areas with lower cancer screening rates.
  • A specific high-risk geographic area has been identified for targeted patient- and provider-focused interventions.
  • GIS and LISA analyses are effective tools for identifying areas with critical needs for interventions to reduce health disparities.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods: