Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

The Antihypertensive Effects and Mechanisms of Huotan Jiedu Tongluo Decoction in Rats with H-Type Hypertension
Published on: May 17, 2024
Patients with prehypertension - do we have enough evidence to treat them?
Michalska Marta, Alberto Zanchetti, Nathan D Wong
1Department of Hypertension, WAM University Hospital in Lodz, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego 113; 90-549 Lodz, Poland. maciejbanach@aol.co.uk.
Insights
The introduction of prehypertension (preHT) in 2003 is debated due to potential anxiety and lack of clear evidence for treatment benefits. Further research is needed to clarify its clinical justification and patient risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Public Health
Background:
- The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC VII) defined prehypertension (preHT) in 2003, categorizing blood pressure (BP) levels between 120-139/80-89 mmHg.
- Individuals with preHT were considered at increased risk for developing hypertension, with higher BP ranges showing a doubled risk compared to lower values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the evidence base and justification for the introduction of the prehypertension category.
- To discuss the potential psychological impact and healthcare utilization associated with the preHT classification.
- To explore alternative classifications and the current evidence regarding antihypertensive therapy benefits in preHT patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical analysis of existing studies and clinical guidelines.
- Examination of the debate surrounding the definition and implications of prehypertension.
- Assessment of evidence for antihypertensive treatment efficacy in preHT populations.
Main Results:
- The introduction of prehypertension has been a subject of significant debate regarding its evidential basis and clinical necessity.
- Concerns exist that the preHT label may induce anxiety and lead to unnecessary medical interventions.
- The heterogeneity within the preHT group suggests that finer risk stratification, such as differentiating normal and high-normal BP, might be more appropriate.
- Current evidence for the benefit of antihypertensive drug therapy in reducing adverse outcomes in preHT patients remains inconclusive.
Conclusions:
- The clinical utility and justification of the prehypertension category require further rigorous evaluation.
- A more nuanced approach to classifying BP levels may be necessary to accurately reflect cardiovascular disease risk.
- More robust evidence is needed to support the use of antihypertensive medications for outcome reduction in individuals classified with prehypertension.
Abstract:
In 2003, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure established a definition of a new category of BP levels called 'prehypertension' (preHT) that included individuals with a systolic BP of 120-139 mm Hg or a diastolic BP of 80-89 mm Hg. Patients with preHT were considered to be at increased risk for progression to hypertension and in individuals with BP in the range 130/80 to 139/89 mmHg the risk of developing hypertension was twice as high as in subjects with lower values. Still then there has been a large debate whether the introduction of preHT was based on evidence and as a consequence, it was fully justified. It has been suggested that the term prehypertension may in many subjects create anxiety and a need for unnecessary medical visits and examinations. This group of patients is also very heterogeneous and it has been pointed out that subdividing preHT group into individuals with normal BP and high normal BP would much better correspond to the continuum of BP risk for CV disease. Finally, despite some data suggesting the potential benefits of antihypertensive therapy in patients with preHT (high normal BP), there are still no hard evidences on the outcome reduction by giving antihypertensive drugs in these individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology