Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits
Ryan J Albert1, John M Lishman, Juhi R Saxena
1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Wastewater Management, Permits Division, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20460, USA. albert.ryan@epa.gov
Shipping ballast water introduces nonindigenous species. This review clarifies international and U.S. regulations for scientists, highlighting the need for improved risk assessment in setting effective ballast water discharge standards.
Area of Science:
- Marine Biology
- Environmental Science
- Regulatory Policy
Background:
- Ballast water discharge from shipping is a primary vector for introducing nonindigenous aquatic species.
- Existing ballast water management practices and discharge standards aim to mitigate the spread of these invasive species.
- Scientific understanding of regulatory frameworks is crucial for informing policy and research on ballast water management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide scientists with a concise review of the regulatory landscape for ballast water management.
- To outline different international, U.S. federal, and state-level regulatory approaches.
- To identify research needs for developing more effective, risk-based ballast water discharge standards.
Main Methods:
- Review of international regulations, including those from the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
- Analysis of U.S. federal regulations from the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Examination of state-specific regulations in the U.S. (e.g., California, New York, Minnesota) and domestic regimes in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
Main Results:
- Regulatory approaches vary globally, leading to inconsistent ballast water discharge limits.
- Many current numeric concentration-based limits are not founded on robust risk-assessment methodologies.
- Ballast water exchange is often used as a provisional measure pending the adoption of science-based standards.
Conclusions:
- The scientific community's input is vital for refining risk-assessment methodologies to improve ballast water discharge standards.
- Developing standardized, risk-based approaches is essential for effective regulation of ballast water.
- Further research is needed to bridge the gap between scientific understanding and regulatory implementation.
More Related Videos
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
06:26Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events
Published on: November 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Net Change Theorem
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Quality of Water
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Typical Model Studies