Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Cognitive-affective and behavioral pain mechanisms in individuals with chronic low back pain: a network analysis.

Pain·2026
Same author

Using Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials to Characterize Wide-Ranging Retinopathy Linked to <i>CRB1</i>: Implications for Clinical Trials.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Beyond binding: lunch can be surprisingly affordable.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Experience sampling methods require more than numbers.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Comparing training window selection methods for prediction in non-stationary time series.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Matching structural, effective, and functional connectivity: a comparison between structural equation modeling and

Laura F Bringmann1, H Steven Scholte, Lourens J Waldorp

  • 1Department Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. laura.bringmann@ppw.kuleuven.be

Brain Connectivity
|May 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Ancestral graphs (AGs) provide more accurate brain connectivity models than structural equation models (SEM) by accounting for missing brain regions. When all regions are present, both methods perform similarly.

More Related Videos

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Estimating effective brain connectivity is crucial for understanding neural function.
  • Conventional methods like structural equation models (SEM) may be limited by assumptions about complete network information.
  • Ancestral graphs (AGs) offer a novel approach to model brain networks, explicitly handling potentially missing regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of ancestral graphs (AGs) for estimating effective brain connectivity.
  • To compare the performance of AGs against conventional structural equation models (SEM).
  • To determine the impact of potentially missing brain regions on connectivity estimation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from a motion perception task were analyzed.
  • Connection strengths were estimated using both AGs and SEM for six visual cortex regions.
  • Model accuracy was validated by correlating estimated connection strengths with probabilistic tractography data from diffusion tensor images (DTI).

Main Results:

  • Ancestral graphs (AGs) generally yielded more accurate effective connectivity models compared to SEM.
  • The improved accuracy of AGs is attributed to their ability to explicitly model and account for missing brain regions.
  • When the set of considered brain regions was complete, AGs and SEM demonstrated comparable performance.

Conclusions:

  • AGs represent a more accurate method for estimating effective brain connectivity, particularly when network completeness is uncertain.
  • The explicit modeling of missing regions by AGs enhances their reliability in complex neural network analysis.
  • AGs provide a valuable tool for testing assumptions about the completeness of brain network models.