Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

10:44
Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
Published on: July 1, 2016
Optimizing stream water mercury sampling for calculation of fish bioaccumulation factors
Karen Riva-Murray1, Paul M Bradley, Barbara C Scudder Eikenberry
1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy, New York 12180, United States. krmurray@usgs.gov
Environmental Science & Technology
|May 15, 2013
Summary
Optimizing mercury (Hg) water sampling is crucial for accurate fish bioaccumulation factor (BAF) assessments. Focusing on filtered methylmercury (FMeHg) during the growing season, considering streamflow, improves monitoring reliability.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Ecotoxicology
- Aquatic Science
Background:
- Mercury (Hg) bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) are vital for fish monitoring and regulation.
- BAFs depend on accurate fish and water Hg concentrations, making sampling methods critical.
- Existing methods are sensitive to sampling and analysis artifacts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify optimal Hg(water) sampling strategies for reliable BAF calculations.
- To evaluate the impact of water sample timing, filtration, and mercury species on fish-water Hg relationships.
- To improve the accuracy of mercury monitoring in game fish.
Main Methods:
- Modeled Hg(water) concentrations using data from 11 streams/rivers across five states.
- Incorporated fish trophic position and flow-weighted Hg(water) estimates into models.
- Evaluated model parsimony using Akaike's Information Criterion, comparing different Hg species and sampling times.
Main Results:
- Filtered water methylmercury (FMeHg) and unfiltered water methylmercury (UMeHg) provided better models than filtered total mercury.
- Annual mean FMeHg models outperformed those using shorter-term averages.
- Models incorporating high FMeHg concentrations (≥80th percentile), often observed during the growing season, performed best.
- Streamflow influenced high growing-season FMeHg concentrations, with site-specific effects.
Conclusions:
- Optimized streamwater Hg sampling requires assessing site-specific FMeHg-UMeHg relationships.
- Understanding intra-annual temporal variation and streamflow-Hg dynamics is essential for accurate monitoring.
- Filtered methylmercury, sampled strategically during peak seasons and considering flow, enhances mercury assessment reliability.
