Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Equity Theory

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part One.

Biological theory·2026

Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part Two.

Biological theory·2026

Same author

Assessing the Environmental Risks of Health Research Leads to Problematic Mission Creep for Ethics Committees.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same author

Conflicts of Interest, Funding Support, and Author Affiliation in Peer-Reviewed Research on the Relationship between Climate Change and Geophysical Characteristics of Hurricanes.

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society·2026

Same author

The Vicious Spiral of AI Slop: Uncurated machine-generated content threatens research integrity and trust in science, ultimately harming all of us.

American scientist·2026

Same author

Transparent Journal Review of Dual Use Research of Concern.

Health security·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research.

David B Resnik¹, Kevin C Elliott

¹National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. resnikd@niehs.nih.gov

Accountability in Research

|May 16, 2013

Summary

Financial conflicts of interest (COIs) in research require disclosure. Evaluating COIs

Area of Science:

Research Integrity
Scientific Ethics
Conflict of Interest Management

Background:

Journals, government agencies, and universities mandate disclosure of funding and financial interests in research.
Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (COIs) is a primary method for managing these interests.
Critics question the reliability of financial COI information as an indicator of research credibility.

Purpose of the Study:

To argue for the importance of evaluating research on scientific merits while acknowledging the difficulty in detecting financial influences.
To present a framework for assessing the impact of financial relationships on research credibility.
To explore factors determining whether financial interests enhance, undermine, or have no impact on research credibility.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Analysis of five key factors to evaluate the influence of financial relationships on research credibility.
Examination of the financial stake of sponsors, institutions, and researchers in study outcomes.
Assessment of the alignment of financial interests with research objectivity and reliability.

Main Results:

It is challenging to detect subtle influences of financial relationships on research credibility.
Five factors can help determine the impact of financial interests: financial stake, alignment with objectivity, history of bias, manipulability, and oversight mechanisms.
The impact of financial relationships on credibility is context-dependent and varies case by case.

Conclusions:

While scientific merit is crucial, financial relationships can significantly affect research credibility.
A nuanced, case-by-case evaluation is necessary to determine the influence of financial interests.
Financial relationships can, depending on circumstances, undermine, have no impact on, or even enhance research credibility.