Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Mate Choice

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...

Inclusive Fitness

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.

Sex-linked Disorders

Sex-linked Disorders

Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities.

European journal for philosophy of science·2025

Same author

Acceptability and Barriers to Chronic Pain Treatment in Refugee Torture Survivors.

JAMA network open·2025

Same author

Research integrity in Spain: Great expectations, mediocre results.

Accountability in research·2025

Same author

Leaving Against Medical Advice: What's a Nurse to Do?

The American journal of nursing·2025

Same author

Gene Editing, Genetic Selection, and Reasons That Matter.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024

Same author

Biobanking Legislation in Spain: Advancing or Undermining Its Ethical Values?

Biopreservation and biobanking·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework.

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín¹

¹Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, USA.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

|May 18, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Sex selection for social reasons faces criticism. This paper argues that a rights-based liberal framework, focusing on reproductive choice, is inappropriate for evaluating social sex selection ethically.

More Related Videos

Whole-Mount Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization to Study Spermatogenesis in the Anopheles Mosquito

Whole-Mount Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization to Study Spermatogenesis in the Anopheles Mosquito

Published on: May 26, 2023

Rearing and Long-Term Maintenance of Eristalis tenax Hoverflies for Research Studies

Rearing and Long-Term Maintenance of Eristalis tenax Hoverflies for Research Studies

Published on: May 19, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

Whole-Mount Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization to Study Spermatogenesis in the Anopheles Mosquito

Whole-Mount Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization to Study Spermatogenesis in the Anopheles Mosquito

Published on: May 26, 2023

Rearing and Long-Term Maintenance of Eristalis tenax Hoverflies for Research Studies

Rearing and Long-Term Maintenance of Eristalis tenax Hoverflies for Research Studies

Published on: May 19, 2018

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Reproductive Rights
Social Ethics

Background:

Sex selection for social reasons is a contentious practice.
Proponents argue against ethical objections and legal bans, often citing reproductive freedom.
Existing ethical evaluations typically employ a rights-based liberal framework.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the appropriateness of the rights-based liberal framework for assessing social sex selection.
To challenge the ethical justification of sex selection based on reproductive autonomy.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of ethical frameworks.
Examination of the concept of reproductive choice and autonomy.
Argumentative critique of applying liberal rights theories to social sex selection.

Main Results:

The rights-based liberal framework, while applicable to other reproductive choices, is ill-suited for social sex selection.
Ethical concerns regarding social sex selection extend beyond individual autonomy and potential harm to others.

Conclusions:

The ethical debate on social sex selection requires a framework that moves beyond a narrow focus on individual reproductive rights.
A re-evaluation of the ethical permissibility of sex selection is necessary, considering broader societal implications.