Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Bicycle guidelines and crash rates on cycle tracks in the United States
Anne C Lusk1, Patrick Morency, Luis F Miranda-Moreno
1Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. annelusk@hsph.harvard.edu
Objectives:
We studied state-adopted bicycle guidelines to determine whether cycle tracks (physically separated, bicycle-exclusive paths adjacent to sidewalks) were recommended, whether they were built, and their crash rate.
Methods:
We analyzed and compared US bicycle facility guidelines published between 1972 and 1999. We identified 19 cycle tracks in the United States and collected extensive data on cycle track design, usage, and crash history from local communities. We used bicycle counts and crash data to estimate crash rates.
Results:
A bicycle facility guideline written in 1972 endorsed cycle tracks but American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines (1974-1999) discouraged or did not include cycle tracks and did not cite research about crash rates on cycle tracks. For the 19 US cycle tracks we examined, the overall crash rate was 2.3 (95% confidence interval = 1.7, 3.0) per 1 million bicycle kilometers.
Conclusions:
AASHTO bicycle guidelines are not explicitly based on rigorous or up-to-date research. Our results show that the risk of bicycle-vehicle crashes is lower on US cycle tracks than published crashes rates on roadways. This study and previous investigations support building cycle tracks.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Hazard Rate
Fatigue
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...

