Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical Blowhole Incision for Acute Subcutaneous Emphysema: A Novel Approach With Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2019
Same author

Relation between temporal perception and inhibitory control in the Go/No-Go task.

Acta psychologica·2016
Same author

Executive attentional resources in timing: Effects of inhibitory control and cognitive aging.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2015
Same author

Implementing a Clinical Research Management System: One Institution's Successful Approach Following Previous Failures.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2015
Same author

Time perception and temporal order memory.

Acta psychologica·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Involvement of shared resources in time judgment and sequence reasoning tasks.

Scott W Brown1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME 04104-9300, USA.

Acta Psychologica
|May 18, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Time perception and sequence processing share cognitive resources. Concurrent timing tasks impaired sequence judgments more than similarity judgments, supporting their close relationship.

Keywords:
Attentional resourcesDual-task performanceInterferenceSequencingTime perception

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Time perception and sequence processing are hypothesized to rely on shared attentional resources.
  • Understanding the precise relationship between these cognitive functions is crucial for cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the connection between time perception and sequence processing.
  • To differentiate the cognitive resource demands of sequencing versus non-sequencing reasoning tasks when performed concurrently with timing.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed time production (5-second intervals) and two reasoning tasks (sequencing and similarity judgments) separately and concurrently.
  • Interference between tasks was assessed by comparing single-task and dual-task performance metrics (accuracy, reaction time, sensitivity).

Main Results:

  • Both reasoning tasks interfered with time production, increasing duration and variability.
  • Concurrent timing significantly impaired sequencing judgments (slower, less accurate, less sensitive).
  • Similarity judgments were less affected by the concurrent timing task compared to sequencing judgments.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis that time perception and sequence processing are closely linked cognitive functions.
  • These processes likely depend on overlapping attentional resources or neural mechanisms.
  • The differential interference suggests distinct cognitive demands for sequencing versus similarity-based reasoning.