Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Problems in the extrapolation of attributable risk estimates].

O Gefeller1

  • 1Abteilung für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiolgie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

Sozial- Und Praventivmedizin
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends and current spectrum of contact allergy in Central Europe: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007-2018.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

The Garment Protection Factor: further advances in labelling sun-protective clothing.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Memorandum "Open Metadata". Open Access to Documentation Forms and Item Catalogs in Healthcare.

Methods of information in medicine·2015
Same author

The evolution of boosting algorithms. From machine learning to statistical modelling.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Extending statistical boosting. An overview of recent methodological developments.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Risk factors of polysensitization to contact allergens.

The British journal of dermatology·2013

Generalizing epidemiologic findings requires medical evidence, not just statistical methods. This study reviews methods for extrapolating attributable risk estimates, highlighting their limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Epidemiology

Context:

  • Generalizing epidemiologic results across populations is a long-standing debate.
  • Methodological justification for inferences beyond a study population is lacking.
  • Conclusions drawn from study populations often rely on analogy and require medical substantiation.

Purpose:

  • To critically review proposed methods for extrapolating attributable risk estimates.
  • To introduce the concept of attributable risk.
  • To illustrate the application and limitations of extrapolation methods using real-world data.

Summary:

  • The generalization of epidemiologic findings to different populations lacks methodological justification and relies on analogy.
  • Two methods for extrapolating attributable risk estimates are critically examined.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Leubeck Blood Pressure Study data is used to demonstrate the practical use and constraints of these extrapolation techniques.

    • Impact:

    • Highlights the need for robust medical arguments when generalizing epidemiologic data.
    • Provides a critical evaluation of attributable risk extrapolation methods.
    • Offers practical insights into applying and understanding the limitations of these methods in cardiovascular epidemiology.