Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optical Performance of a Novel Non-diffractive Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens as a Function of Defocus and Pupil Size.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Comparative Visual Outcomes of Toric and Nontoric Intraocular Lenses Featuring Combined Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Multifocal Designs.

Journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Stromal Transplantation and corneal-sparing techniques in ectatic diseases.

Progress in retinal and eye research·2026
Same author

Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in pediatric keratoconus: Up to 10 years of follow-up.

European journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Inflammatory Response of Presbyopes Neophyte Contact Lens Wearers during 6 Months of Multifocal Lens Wear.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same author

Optical and clinical outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.

European journal of ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses.

Robert Montés-Micó1, David Madrid-Costa, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer

  • 1Optometry Research Group, Optics Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. robert.montes@uv.es

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|May 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study compared the optical quality of bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The bifocal IOL offered a wider visual range, while the trifocal IOL provided better intermediate focus quality.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
08:28

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses

Published on: April 6, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
08:28

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses

Published on: April 6, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optical Engineering
  • Biomedical Optics

Background:

  • Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are crucial for vision restoration after cataract surgery.
  • Multifocal IOLs aim to provide clear vision at multiple distances.
  • Apodized diffractive multifocal IOLs are designed to manage light distribution for enhanced visual performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the in vitro optical quality of a bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a trifocal IOL.
  • To evaluate the performance of these IOLs at various focal points and pupil sizes.
  • To determine the modulation transfer function (MTF) across different focal distances.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental evaluation of Acrysof Restor (bifocal) and Finevision (trifocal) IOLs.
  • Quantification of optical quality using modulation transfer function (MTF).
  • Assessment at 7 focal points, through-focus MTF at 10 focal points, and for 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm apertures.

Main Results:

  • The bifocal IOL demonstrated higher MTF values at distance and near focal points (-0.0 D, -2.5 D, -3.0 D).
  • The trifocal IOL exhibited superior MTF values at intermediate focal points (-1.5 D, -3.5 D).
  • Through-focus MTF curves revealed distinct peaks, with 2 for bifocal and 3 for trifocal IOLs.

Conclusions:

  • The bifocal IOL may offer a broader range of vision from distance to near compared to the trifocal IOL.
  • The trifocal IOL is likely to provide better optical quality specifically at the intermediate focal point (-1.5 D).
  • Both IOL designs present distinct optical performance characteristics across different focal demands.