Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

11:53
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of mitigation methods for multiple pollutants at farm scale
R D Gooday1, S G Anthony, D R Chadwick
1ADAS UK Ltd, Wolverhampton WV9 5AP, UK.
The Science of the Total Environment
|May 28, 2013
Summary
This study introduces a farm-scale decision support tool to identify cost-effective agricultural pollution mitigation strategies. It helps target diffuse pollution control for air and water quality, meeting policy objectives.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Management
Background:
- Agricultural pollution reduction is critical for meeting national and international policy targets for air and water quality.
- Existing studies often focus on individual mitigation methods and pollutants, limiting comprehensive solutions.
- A need exists for integrated approaches to assess multiple methods and pollutants for optimal pollution control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a conceptual model for synthesizing evidence on multiple mitigation methods and pollutants.
- To develop a farm-scale decision support tool for identifying least-cost solutions for multiple policy objectives.
- To demonstrate the tool's application in targeting diffuse pollution control in agriculture.
Main Methods:
- Developed a conceptual model for evidence synthesis.
- Implemented a farm-scale decision support tool incorporating a genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization.
- Quantified baseline pollutant losses from identifiable sources, areas, and pathways.
- Demonstrated the tool using data from two contrasting farm systems in England and Wales.
Main Results:
- The decision support tool effectively quantifies baseline pollutant losses and identifies optimal suites of mitigation methods.
- Demonstration cases show the tool's utility in targeting mitigation options for diffuse agricultural pollution.
- The tool is generic and adaptable, allowing for the integration of measured data and expanded mitigation libraries.
Conclusions:
- The developed tool provides a novel approach to optimizing agricultural pollution control strategies.
- It can assist in targeting mitigation efforts for diffuse pollution, supporting policy objectives.
- The tool has potential as part of the farm advisory process, facilitating informed decision-making.

