Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
Published on: March 3, 2015
A phase II flexible screening design allowing for interim analysis and comparison with historical control
Wenting Wu1, Brian Bot, Yan Hu
1Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55901, USA. wu.wenting@mayo.edu
This study enhances a flexible screening design for clinical trials by adding interim analysis and historical control comparisons. These modifications improve treatment selection and reduce patient exposure to ineffective therapies.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial design
- Biostatistics
- Oncology drug development
Background:
- The original Sargent and Goldberg (SG) design offers a flexible approach for phase II trials.
- Selecting optimal regimens for phase III requires robust evaluation of multiple characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the SG design with interim analysis and historical control comparison capabilities.
- To enhance the identification of promising treatments with clinically meaningful efficacy.
- To reduce patient exposure to inferior treatment options.
Main Methods:
- Modification of the randomized phase II flexible screening (SG) design.
- Incorporation of interim analysis for early assessment.
- Inclusion of a historical control for efficacy benchmarking.
Main Results:
- Modified SG designs maintain moderate sample size increases.
- Substantially expanded utility of the flexible screening approach.
- Improved assurance of clinically meaningful treatment efficacy.
Conclusions:
- The modified SG designs offer a more comprehensive and efficient approach to phase II clinical trials.
- These enhancements provide greater confidence in treatment selection for phase III studies.
- The updated design balances statistical rigor with patient welfare.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
