Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions01:27

Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions

Biasing metal-semiconductor junctions involves applying a voltage across the junction. Specifically, the metal is connected to a voltage source, while the semiconductor is grounded. This technique is essential for controlling the direction and magnitude of current flow in electronic devices, including diodes, transistors, and photovoltaic cells.
In Schottky junctions, where the semiconductor is n-type, applying a positive voltage to the metal relative to the semiconductor reduces its Fermi...
Biasing of FET01:22

Biasing of FET

Biasing a Junction Field Effect Transistor (JFET) is crucial for setting operational parameters and ensuring efficient functioning in electronic circuits. JFETs are characterized by using a single carrier type in N-channel or P-channel configurations, where the channel is surrounded by PN junctions. These junctions are central to the device's ability to control current flow.
In an N-channel JFET, the structure consists of N-type material forming the channel on a P-type substrate, with the gate...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to: "On the understanding of current-induced spin polarization of three-dimensional topological insulators".

Nature communications·2019
Same author

Electrical detection of current generated spin in topological insulator surface states: Role of interface resistance.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Electrical Detection of Charge-to-spin and Spin-to-Charge Conversion in a Topological Insulator Bi<sub>2</sub>Te<sub>3</sub> Using BN/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Hybrid Tunnel Barrier.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Optical polarization of excitons and trions under continuous and pulsed excitation in single layers of WSe<sub>2</sub>.

Nanoscale·2017
Same author

Direct comparison of current-induced spin polarization in topological insulator Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> and InAs Rashba states.

Nature communications·2016
Same author

Electrical Detection of the Helical Spin Texture in a p-type Topological Insulator Sb2Te3.

Scientific reports·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

Exchange bias of the interface spin system at the Fe/MgO interface.

Y Fan1, K J Smith, G Lüpke

  • 1Department of Applied Science, College of William and Mary, 251 Jamestown Road, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA.

Nature Nanotechnology
|June 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Researchers discovered a novel exchange bias phenomenon at the ferromagnet/oxide interface, distinct from bulk behavior. This finding is crucial for advancing spintronic and multiferroic technologies.

More Related Videos

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx
09:49

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx
09:49

In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy with Biasing and Fabrication of Asymmetric Crossbars Based on Mixed-Phased a-VOx

Published on: May 13, 2020

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Surface Science

Background:

  • The ferromagnet/oxide interface is critical for next-generation multiferroic and spintronic devices.
  • Understanding interface magnetism is essential for controlling device functionality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the magnetization behavior at the Fe/MgO interface.
  • To identify and characterize novel magnetic phenomena at this interface.

Main Methods:

  • Probing interface magnetization using magnetic hysteresis loops.
  • Analyzing bulk magnetization for comparison.
  • Controlling interface oxygen concentration and Fe-O bonding.

Main Results:

  • A distinct exchange bias phenomenon was observed exclusively at the Fe/MgO interface, not in the bulk.
  • The interface magnetization showed a pronounced shift, indicating an antiferromagnetic exchange pinning layer (FeO patches).
  • Interface atomic moments were found to be non-collinear with bulk magnetization.

Conclusions:

  • The study reveals an interfacial antiferromagnetic pinning layer at nominally clean Fe/MgO interfaces.
  • Non-collinear interface moments can influence net anisotropy and act as spin scattering sites.
  • Controlling interface oxygen concentration and bonding allows tuning of exchange bias magnitude.