Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tangeretin prevents cardiac failure induced by reperfusion/ischaemia by inhibiting apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and JNK/ERK pathway.

Archives of medical science : AMS·2026
Same author

Real-World Evidence on the Efficacy of Icaritin for Unresectable Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

C2M-Mamba: drug-drug interaction prediction based on cross-modal cross-Mamba.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Hydroxylase Thermostability Prediction Based on Self-Trained Semisupervised Iteration and Bayesian Dynamic Tuning.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Enhancing k<sub>cat</sub> prediction through residue-aware attention mechanism and pre-trained representations.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

CSANet: Context-Spatial Awareness Network for RGB-T Urban Scene Understanding.

Journal of imaging·2025
Same journal

Real-time EEG-based epileptic seizure prediction using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

R-peak detection and ECG data compression scheme based on empirical mode decomposition and wavelet transform.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

CastNet: A three-channel EEG-based deep learning model for cross-subject depression detection.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

State-of-the-art TinyML approaches for colorectal cancer detection: Current advances, challenges, and future directions.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

JRadiEvo: A Japanese radiology report generation model enhanced by evolutionary optimization of model merging.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causally-informed deep learning towards explainable and generalizable outcome prediction in critical care.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Subpopulation-specific confidence designation for more informative biomedical classification.

Chuanlei Zhang1, Ralph L Kodell

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Philander Smith College, 900 W. Daisy L. Gatson Bates Dr., Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
|June 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new subpopulation-based confidence approach for classification algorithms, improving accuracy by accounting for patient heterogeneity. Higher confidence levels in subpopulations correlate with increased classification accuracy for tailored therapies.

Keywords:
Cross-validationGenomic predictionIndividualized therapyPopulation heterogeneity

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Medical informatics
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Classification algorithms are vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
  • Current algorithms often assume patient homogeneity, which is clinically unsatisfactory.
  • Exploiting population heterogeneity can improve therapeutic tailoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel subpopulation-based confidence approach to address patient heterogeneity in classification.
  • To differentiate classification accuracy across subpopulations for personalized medicine.
  • To enhance the clinical utility of classification algorithms by accounting for individual variability.

Main Methods:

  • A selective voting algorithm using an ensemble of convex-hull classifiers was developed.
  • Training samples were clustered into three internally homogeneous subpopulations based on predictivity.
  • Two distance measures were employed for subpopulation clustering and test sample assignment.

Main Results:

  • The approach was validated on six public datasets, showing a positive correlation between training sample predictivity and test sample accuracy.
  • An average accuracy difference of 17.8% was observed between highest- and lowest-confidence subpopulations.
  • Individual dataset results showed accuracy differences ranging from 11.3% to 24.1%.

Conclusions:

  • Classification accuracy consistently increases with higher designated confidence levels.
  • The subpopulation-based confidence approach effectively leverages patient heterogeneity.
  • This method supports the goal of tailoring therapies on an individual basis.