Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
PCR-based diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection
Xinhua Qu1, Zanjing Zhai, Huiwu Li
1Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Implants, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract:
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate use of PCR assays for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.92) and 0.91 (CI, 0.81 to 0.96), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that use of tissue samples may improve sensitivity, and quantitative PCR and sonication of prostheses fluid may improve specificity. The results showed that PCR is reliable and accurate for detection of PJI.
Insights
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are reliable for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI). This meta-analysis confirms PCR
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following joint replacement surgery.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of PJI is crucial for effective treatment and patient outcomes.
- Current diagnostic methods have limitations, necessitating evaluation of alternative approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for detecting prosthetic joint infection (PJI).
- To determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCR in PJI diagnosis through meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted on studies evaluating PCR assays for PJI diagnosis.
- Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using data from included studies.
- Subgroup analyses were performed to explore factors influencing PCR performance.
Main Results:
- The pooled sensitivity for PCR in PJI diagnosis was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.92).
- The pooled specificity for PCR in PJI diagnosis was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.96).
- Subgroup analyses indicated potential improvements in sensitivity with tissue samples and specificity with quantitative PCR and sonication.
Conclusions:
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays demonstrate reliable and accurate performance for the detection of prosthetic joint infection (PJI).
- Optimized PCR protocols, including the use of tissue samples and sonication of prosthesis fluid, may enhance diagnostic accuracy.
- PCR represents a valuable tool in the diagnostic armamentarium for PJI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

