Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

13:58
Probing C84-embedded Si Substrate Using Scanning Probe Microscopy and Molecular Dynamics
Published on: September 28, 2016
Band-bending at buried SiO2/Si interface as probed by XPS
Mehmet Çopuroğlu1, Hikmet Sezen, Robert L Opila
1Department of Chemistry, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|June 19, 2013
Summary
Photoinduced shifts in silicon dioxide/silicon interfaces reveal charge states. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed significant shifts in p-type silicon but minimal shifts in n-type silicon.
Area of Science:
- Surface Science
- Materials Science
- Semiconductor Physics
Background:
- The SiO2/Si interface is crucial for semiconductor device performance.
- Understanding charge dynamics at this interface is essential for device stability and efficiency.
- Direct probing of buried interfaces can be challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate photoinduced shifts in core-level binding energies at SiO2/Si interfaces.
- To determine the influence of silicon type (p-type vs. n-type) on these photoinduced shifts.
- To correlate observed shifts with the charge state of the interface.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to analyze Si2p, O1s, and C1s core-level spectra.
- Examining samples with varying oxide layers (thermal/anodic) and organic coatings on p- and n-Si wafers.
- Employing multiple illumination sources to induce photoeffects.
Main Results:
- Significant photoinduced shifts (0.2–0.5 eV) were observed for p-type Si samples.
- Substantially smaller shifts (<0.1 eV) were detected for n-type Si samples.
- Shifts were independent of oxidation method, oxide thickness, organic layer type, and light source color.
Conclusions:
- The observed photoinduced shifts are indicative of the charge state of the SiO2/Si interface.
- This phenomenon provides a method to probe even buried interfaces (up to 20 nm oxide thickness).
- The distinct behavior between p-type and n-type silicon highlights differences in interface charge dynamics.

