Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Formulation and Characterization of Bioactive Agent Containing Nanodisks
Published on: March 17, 2023
Nephrotoxicity and other adverse events among inpatients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B lipid
Rolin L Wade1, Paresh Chaudhari, Jaime L Natoli
1Cerner Research, Culver City, CA, USA.
Abstract:
Nephrotoxicity evaluations between liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) have provided mixed results. This retrospective study used an electronic medical record database of hospitalized patients with invasive fungal infections treated with either L-AMB or ABLC. Patients had renal insufficiency, clinical condition suggesting intolerance to amphotericin B deoxycholate (CAB), or recent CAB exposure. Baseline SCr, exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and total amphotericin B exposure were similar between the groups. In 105 patients administered L-AMB, 10.6% had nephrotoxicity versus 22.6% of 222 patients administered ABLC (P = 0.020). A logistic regression model found ABLC patients had 3.48 higher odds (95% CI 1.05-11.52) than L-AMB of developing nephrotoxicity. Infusion reactions were more prevalent with ABLC (23.9% versus 9.5%, P = 0.002) as was hypomagnesemia (44.3% versus 28.1%, P = 0.033). This study demonstrated that L-AMB is associated with less nephrotoxicity, infusion reactions and hypomagnesemia than ABLC in patients at increased risk of nephrotoxicity.
Insights
Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) showed significantly less nephrotoxicity, infusion reactions, and hypomagnesemia compared to amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in high-risk patients with invasive fungal infections.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Nephrotoxicity of lipid formulations of amphotericin B, including liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), has yielded conflicting results.
- Patients with invasive fungal infections often require amphotericin B, but its nephrotoxic potential necessitates careful evaluation of alternative formulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity between L-AMB and ABLC in hospitalized patients with invasive fungal infections.
- To assess other adverse events, including infusion reactions and hypomagnesemia, associated with L-AMB and ABLC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records for hospitalized patients treated with L-AMB or ABLC.
- Inclusion criteria comprised patients with renal insufficiency, intolerance to conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (CAB), or recent CAB exposure.
- Comparison of nephrotoxicity rates, infusion reactions, and hypomagnesemia between the L-AMB and ABLC groups, with logistic regression analysis.
Main Results:
- Nephrotoxicity occurred in 10.6% of L-AMB recipients versus 22.6% of ABLC recipients (P = 0.020).
- Patients receiving ABLC had 3.48 times higher odds of developing nephrotoxicity compared to L-AMB (95% CI 1.05-11.52).
- Infusion reactions (23.9% vs 9.5%, P = 0.002) and hypomagnesemia (44.3% vs 28.1%, P = 0.033) were more frequent with ABLC.
Conclusions:
- Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) is associated with a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity compared to amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC).
- L-AMB demonstrated a favorable safety profile regarding infusion reactions and hypomagnesemia in patients at increased risk for nephrotoxicity.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...