Diluting the benefits of hemostatic resuscitation: a multi-institutional analysis

Juan Carlos Duchesne1, Jiselle Heaney, Chrissy Guidry

  • 1Section of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anesthesia, Emergency Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-2699, USA. jduchesn@tulane.edu

Insights

High-ratio resuscitation (HRR) in massive transfusion protocols (MTP) is linked to lower mortality. However, excessive crystalloid use in HRR MTP patients significantly increases morbidity, including ARDS and acute renal failure.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Hemorrhagic Shock Management

Background:

  • Minimizing crystalloids is standard in severe hemorrhage resuscitation.
  • The impact of crystalloids on high-ratio resuscitation (HRR) outcomes remains unclear.
  • This study investigates crystalloid's role in HRR within massive transfusion protocols (MTP).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the direct impact of 24-hour crystalloid volume on HRR MTP patients receiving ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC).
  • To compare outcomes between HRR and low-ratio resuscitation (LRR) groups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multi-institutional analysis (MIA) of 451 patients over 4 years.
  • Patients received MTP with damage-control laparotomy.
  • Groups defined by fresh frozen plasma/PRBC ratios: HRR (1:1-1:2) and LRR (<1:2).

Main Results:

  • HRR group (80.9%) showed significantly higher 24-hour survival (85.2%) than LRR (19.0%, 68.6%).
  • Crystalloid volume did not significantly impact mortality in HRR MTP patients.
  • Increased morbidity (bacteremia, ARDS, acute renal failure) was associated with higher crystalloid volumes in HRR.

Conclusions:

  • HRR is associated with decreased mortality compared to LRR in MTP.
  • This MIA is the first to show increased morbidity from crystalloid use in HRR.
  • Crystalloid volume, not HRR itself, predicted morbidity; caution with crystalloid use in HRR is advised.
Abstract