Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Do people really say it is "likely" when they believe it is only "possible"? Effect of politeness on risk
Marie Juanchich1, Miroslav Sirota
1Department of Management, Kingston Business School, Kingston University, Kingston, UK. M.Juanchich@kingston.ac.uk
Abstract:
Politeness theory posits that speakers can use verbal probabilities (e.g., there is a chance, it is likely) to hedge bad news. So far, only indirect evidence supports that claim: From the hearer's standpoint, verbal probabilities are interpreted either as plain likelihood-communication devices or as face-management devices, resulting in different risk perceptions. The present research aims to test more directly the postulate of politeness theory by focusing on the effects of speakers' intentions on risk communication. In three experiments, participants communicated a probability by choosing an expression from a list of verbal probabilities. Results consistently showed that polite speakers communicated a different risk magnitude than informative speakers. Further findings indicate that the effect of the speakers' intention depends on the valence of the uncertain outcome. The theoretical and applied implications of these findings are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
The Availability Heuristic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Framing Effects
Odds Ratio
Relative Risk

